# llama-server-simulator Implementation Summary ## Overview Successfully implemented a standalone Python script that simulates a llama-server HTTP endpoint for testing the eval script. ## Features Implemented ### 1. HTTP Server - Flask-based `/v1/chat/completions` endpoint - OpenAI-compatible response format - Configurable port and host ### 2. AIME Dataset Integration - Loads AIME dataset from HuggingFace - In-memory storage for fast lookup - 90 questions loaded from train split ### 3. Intelligent Question Matching - **Exact matching**: Direct string comparison - **LaTeX removal**: Removes `$...$` formatting for flexible matching - **Levenshtein distance**: Calculates similarity between strings - **Partial matching**: Finds best match even with small differences ### 4. Response Generation - Configurable success rate (0-1) - Returns correct answers when success rate allows - Returns wrong answers when success rate doesn't allow - Wrong answers are generated by incrementing the expected answer ### 5. Debug Logging - Debug messages written to stderr - Logs request content, matching results, and distances - Helps troubleshoot matching issues ## Configuration Options ```bash python3 llama-server-simulator.py \ --port 8034 \ --host localhost \ --success-rate 0.8 \ --dataset-split train ``` ## Testing Results ### Test 1: Correct Answer - **Success rate**: 0.8 - **Expected answer**: 116 - **Result**: ✓ Correct (116) ### Test 2: Wrong Answer - **Success rate**: 0.0 - **Expected answer**: 116 - **Result**: ✓ Wrong (117) ### Test 3: No Matching Question - **Request**: "What is the capital of France?" - **Result**: ✓ Returns error "No matching question found" ### Test 4: Success Rate Verification - **Success rate**: 0.8 - **Requests**: 10 - **Correct answers**: 8/10 (80%) - **Result**: ✓ Success rate working as expected ## Technical Details ### Matching Algorithm 1. Try exact match (case-insensitive) 2. Try match after removing LaTeX formatting 3. Calculate Levenshtein distance for partial matches 4. Return best match if distance < 0.3 (30% difference) ### Response Format ```json { "id": "chatcmpl-1769864875", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1769864875, "model": "llama", "choices": [ { "index": 0, "message": { "role": "assistant", "content": "116" }, "finish_reason": "stop" } ], "usage": { "prompt_tokens": 100, "completion_tokens": 50, "total_tokens": 150 } } ``` ## Files Created 1. `llama-server-simulator.py` - Main simulator script 2. `test-simulator.sh` - Basic test script 3. `test-simulator-comprehensive.sh` - Comprehensive test script 4. `llama-server-simulator-plan.md` - Implementation plan 5. `llama-eval-discussion.md` - Discussion notes ## Next Steps 1. ✓ Basic simulator structure 2. ✓ AIME dataset integration 3. ✓ Question matching with Levenshtein distance 4. ✓ Response generation with configurable success rate 5. ✓ Testing with curl requests 6. ⏭️ Integrate with eval script 7. ⏭️ Implement eval state object 8. ⏭️ Implement processor object 9. ⏭️ Add real-time progress reporting ## Known Limitations 1. Only supports AIME dataset (train split) 2. Matching is case-insensitive 3. Wrong answers are simple increments (not realistic) 4. No support for multiple endpoints 5. No distributed evaluation ## Future Enhancements 1. Support multiple datasets 2. More sophisticated wrong answer generation 3. Multiple endpoint support 4. Distributed evaluation 5. Real-time progress reporting 6. Eval state serialization