From fd662b4b0bca502cd6ec738df6277e0680921ce3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hanishkvc <hanishkvc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:50:35 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] SimpleChatTC: ToolCall hs info in normal assistant-user chat
 flow

Also as part of same, wrap the request details in the assistant
block using a similar tagging format as the tool_response in user
block.
---
 tools/server/public_simplechat/readme.md     | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/server/public_simplechat/simplechat.js |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/server/public_simplechat/readme.md b/tools/server/public_simplechat/readme.md
index 388202156e..19e0452069 100644
--- a/tools/server/public_simplechat/readme.md
+++ b/tools/server/public_simplechat/readme.md
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ work.
 
 ### Tool Calling
 
+#### Extending wiht new tools
+
 Provide a descriptive meta data explaining the tool / function being provided for tool calling.
 
 Provide a handler which should implement the specified tool / function call. It should place
@@ -311,6 +313,23 @@ Update the tc_switch to include a object entry for the tool, which inturn icnlud
 * a reference to the handler and also
 * the result key
 
+#### Mapping tool calls and responses to normal assistant - user chat flow
+
+Instead of maintaining tool_call request and resultant response in logically seperate parallel
+channel used for requesting tool_calls by the assistant and the resulstant tool role response,
+the SimpleChatTC pushes it into the normal assistant - user chat flow itself, by including the
+tool call and response as a pair of tagged request with details in the assistant block and inturn
+tagged response in the subsequent user block.
+
+This allows the GenAi/LLM to be aware of the tool calls it made as well as the responses it got,
+so that it can incorporate the results of the same in the subsequent chat / interactions.
+
+NOTE: This flow tested to be ok enough with Gemma-3N-E4B-it-Q8_0 LLM ai model for now.
+
+TODO: Need to think later, whether to continue this simple flow, or atleast use tool role wrt
+the tool call responses or even go further and have the logically seperate tool_call request
+structures also.
+
 
 ### Debuging the handshake
 
diff --git a/tools/server/public_simplechat/simplechat.js b/tools/server/public_simplechat/simplechat.js
index 4e243db2f0..83911fde42 100644
--- a/tools/server/public_simplechat/simplechat.js
+++ b/tools/server/public_simplechat/simplechat.js
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ class AssistantResponse {
         if (this.response.content !== "") {
             return this.response.content;
         } else if (this.response.toolname !== "") {
-            return `ToolCall:${this.response.toolname}:${this.response.toolargs}`;
+            return `<tool_call>\n<tool_name>${this.response.toolname}</tool_name>\n<tool_args>${this.response.toolargs}</tool_args>\n</tool_call>`;
         } else {
             return ""
         }